A question has arisen over combat repair, with John arguing for an approach under which anything damaged in combat would be checked on arrival at the next dockyard, and either
a) be given a swift kick and magically spring into life (50% of the time) or
b) cause your docky to suck in his breath sharply and say "that gonna have ta come aht, gov." (the other 50% of the time)
This would include stuff which you didn't manage to do a combat repair on.
From my perspective, if this is what people want, I'd just as soon drop the whole idea of repair, because it's the thin end of the wedge - next thing would be people arguing that combat repair should give you a plus on the dice roll, and then someone else would say a six should automatically make the part clone itself.
More rigorously, the economic model we started from BEGAN with the idea of repairing everything at full cost, and I then worked out the available money to make that possible, but tricky. So halving the cost of repair makes a mess of that idea. It also benefits big ships more than small ships, and one of the original design aims was to give us battles with smaller ships rather than fleets of big over the top megalomobiles.
My own argument on the followthrough to combat repair started from the supposition that it's only possible at all when the system isn't that badly banged up, in which case patching it up properly at the dockyard might involve less than a full replacement. So as I originally wrote the rule, there was a spectrum of results, from no charge up to about 75%. This was then simplified to the current all or nothing approach, which averages out at 50%. In essence it was a bit of a bonus for combat repair which I thought wouldn't do too much damage to the economics of the campaign, since combat repair's not that commonly successful.
While I'm here, a simple piece of news on repair costs; the repair costs of core systems were never made clear; it's one third of the cost of the keel of the ship, in the unlikely event that you ever find yourself in the position of repairing one.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(65)
-
▼
April
(41)
- And the same thoughts, but not in gibberish
- News from the sector
- When the UNSC gets around to naming ships
- One little link
- Minor rule clarification
- Continuing news from our conflict correspondents
- Paying visits to planets; a revised etiquette guide
- One way to deal with Savasku
- The growing threat of conflict in the region
- 20% off for army surplus
- We have met the enemy and he is you
- System Defences; a superficial analysis
- The inverse Q ship
- K-gun ballistics, the detail
- Charted routes and interdiction
- Re-roll damage
- Repair
- The Average Taxpayer has just died OR K-Gun ballis...
- Leading by example
- New race
- Drive-by shootings; how the rules constrain them
- But I don't like it that way OR it seemed like a g...
- Windshield wipers
- Economic turn clarification Revised
- Left over money
- Combat Repair
- Focus
- Savasku, and the need to start every day with a he...
- Logistics ships
- Oceanic Union Defence Forces and the Islamic Feder...
- Bugging out; when bad things happen to inept people
- Travel to distant exotic suns, meet interesting pe...
- Allies
- Gentlemen, start your engines
- Grasers; simplified cost benefit analysis
- Big versus small
- Turns. The ugly, expensive option
- UNSC ships
- After Action thoughts; four way battle of 10 April 07
- The Campaign Rules Proper
- Introduction
-
▼
April
(41)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment